Varcs principle for uk validating bodies

17-Sep-2015 05:54 by 8 Comments

Varcs principle for uk validating bodies

This article introduces Healthy Universities; reports on a qualitative study exploring the potential for a national programme contributing to health, well-being and sustainable development; and concludes with reflections and recommendations.The study used questionnaires and interviews with key informants from English higher education institutions and national stakeholder organizations.

varcs principle for uk validating bodies-59

The rationale for this is clear: university often serves as a key life transition stage for young people exploring and experimenting away from parental influence (Abercrombie , 2000).Key recommendations relate to national programme development, research and evaluation and international collaboration and networking., 2001; Dooris, 2006), the reality is that they have often been used interchangeably (e.g.the term ‘Health Promoting Schools’ has been used at a European level while the term ‘Healthy Schools’ has been used in England).Universities function within the context of local, regional and global communities.It is therefore also pertinent to consider the relationship between HEIs and broader community health and well-being.Drawing on work of key theorists, Dooris (Dooris, 2005) has presented a conceptual framework suggesting that the healthy settings approach is rooted in values such as participation, partnership, equity and sustainability and characterized by three interrelated dimensions: an ecological model of public health; a systems perspective; and a whole system focus.

Although the potential of schools and further education as settings for health promotion has been recognized through the establishment of international and/or Government-championed programmes ( there has been no such investment in universities.Informants argued that although there are important public health drivers, it will also be necessary to show how a Healthy Universities can help achieve core business objectives and contribute to related agendas such as sustainability.Two models were discussed: an accreditation scheme with externally assessed standardized achievement criteria; and a flexible and light-touch framework focusing on change-related processes and utilizing self-assessment.For the purposes of this article, the term ‘Healthy Universities’ is used throughout, even though the discussion draws on literature that has used the term ‘Health Promoting Universities’.] and the potential for developing a national programme for England.It describes the current higher education context; introduces the healthy settings approach and outlines the history, theory and practice of Healthy Universities; reports on the methodology and findings of a qualitative national-level study; and concludes with reflections and recommendations for moving forward.It is the contention of the authors that many existing tools are inadequate because they fail to embrace the significant body of knowledge accumulated by past and present project managers.